<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dreaded apostrophe strikes again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/</link>
	<description>copywriting : marketing : branding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyunlimited.com/blog/?p=878#comment-31</guid>
		<description>...and I of course meant Christmas with an &#039;h&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and I of course meant Christmas with an &#8216;h&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyunlimited.com/blog/?p=878#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hi both,

I think when your blog title atracts more contention over its grammar, than what it&#039;s actually saying, your best move is to change the title to something else.

I have to say I&#039;m not a fan of the &quot;Dos and don&#039;ts&quot; approach in general, as we see so much of it these days (with varied use of apostrophes), so it becomes invisible. Just Google Dos and Don&#039;ts, and you&#039;ll see what I mean.

Instead, I would suggest you come up with a new title, which is more informative about what your post is about: an encapsulation of the main point you are making. That way, your audience is more likely to read on, and you&#039;ll probably eliminate any grammar debates in the process.

As for your original query, though, Sarah, I agree with your expression of Dos and Don&#039;ts, simply because plurals should never be apostrophised. Allow the word Do&#039;s through, and every grocer in the country will believe they were right all along.

Cheers and happy Cristmas to you both,

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi both,</p>
<p>I think when your blog title atracts more contention over its grammar, than what it&#8217;s actually saying, your best move is to change the title to something else.</p>
<p>I have to say I&#8217;m not a fan of the &#8220;Dos and don&#8217;ts&#8221; approach in general, as we see so much of it these days (with varied use of apostrophes), so it becomes invisible. Just Google Dos and Don&#8217;ts, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean.</p>
<p>Instead, I would suggest you come up with a new title, which is more informative about what your post is about: an encapsulation of the main point you are making. That way, your audience is more likely to read on, and you&#8217;ll probably eliminate any grammar debates in the process.</p>
<p>As for your original query, though, Sarah, I agree with your expression of Dos and Don&#8217;ts, simply because plurals should never be apostrophised. Allow the word Do&#8217;s through, and every grocer in the country will believe they were right all along.</p>
<p>Cheers and happy Cristmas to you both,</p>
<p>Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyunlimited.com/blog/?p=878#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi Sarah,

In this case, I think there&#039;s no clear answer, which is why people have such strong views.

I think the difficulty arises because &lt;strong&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; already has an apostrophe, so we like to balance things out - hence &lt;strong&gt;do&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt;. We have no such problem with &lt;strong&gt;ins and outs&lt;/strong&gt; because there&#039;s not an apostrophe in sight.

To me, &lt;strong&gt;Dos&lt;/strong&gt; suggests a text-based operating system with a good old C prompt (ah, those were the days) so I&#039;d steer clear of it. &lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt; just looks plain bizarre; can you think of any other word with two apostrophes? I can&#039;t.

So on balance, I&#039;d plump for &lt;strong&gt;Do&#039;s and don&#039;ts&lt;/strong&gt;, simply because it appeals to my sense of order, and avoids any confusion when it comes to recognising the first word. For the same reason, I&#039;d write &lt;strong&gt;dotting the i&#039;s and crossing the t&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt;, simply because &lt;strong&gt;dotting the is&lt;/strong&gt; makes the reader stumble (&lt;em&gt;is what?&lt;/em&gt;).

But there&#039;s no hard and fast rule. As Terence said  &lt;strong&gt;quot homines tot sententiae&lt;/strong&gt; - so many men, so many opinions. (And women, of course.)

He also said fortune favours the brave, so I&#039;d stick to your guns if I were you!

Best wishes,
Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sarah,</p>
<p>In this case, I think there&#8217;s no clear answer, which is why people have such strong views.</p>
<p>I think the difficulty arises because <strong>don&#8217;t</strong> already has an apostrophe, so we like to balance things out &#8211; hence <strong>do&#8217;s</strong>. We have no such problem with <strong>ins and outs</strong> because there&#8217;s not an apostrophe in sight.</p>
<p>To me, <strong>Dos</strong> suggests a text-based operating system with a good old C prompt (ah, those were the days) so I&#8217;d steer clear of it. <strong>Don&#8217;t's</strong> just looks plain bizarre; can you think of any other word with two apostrophes? I can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So on balance, I&#8217;d plump for <strong>Do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts</strong>, simply because it appeals to my sense of order, and avoids any confusion when it comes to recognising the first word. For the same reason, I&#8217;d write <strong>dotting the i&#8217;s and crossing the t&#8217;s</strong>, simply because <strong>dotting the is</strong> makes the reader stumble (<em>is what?</em>).</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s no hard and fast rule. As Terence said  <strong>quot homines tot sententiae</strong> &#8211; so many men, so many opinions. (And women, of course.)</p>
<p>He also said fortune favours the brave, so I&#8217;d stick to your guns if I were you!</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.copyunlimited.com/the-dreaded-apostrophe-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyunlimited.com/blog/?p=878#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the much needed post on apostrophes. It&#039;s a good reminder. I&#039;m glad, too, someone else gets niggled by misusage.

Maybe you can help me on an apostrophe stickler. I wrote a blog post titled Social Media Dos and Don&#039;ts. A number of people have notified me I&#039;ve included a grammatical error in my title.  I&#039;m being told it should read Social Media Do&#039;s and Don&#039;ts or Social Media Do&#039;s and Don&#039;t&#039;s. What are your thoughts on this? I&#039;m stubbornly sticking to my guns and haven&#039;t changed title.

Cheers,
Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>Thanks for the much needed post on apostrophes. It&#8217;s a good reminder. I&#8217;m glad, too, someone else gets niggled by misusage.</p>
<p>Maybe you can help me on an apostrophe stickler. I wrote a blog post titled Social Media Dos and Don&#8217;ts. A number of people have notified me I&#8217;ve included a grammatical error in my title.  I&#8217;m being told it should read Social Media Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;ts or Social Media Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;t's. What are your thoughts on this? I&#8217;m stubbornly sticking to my guns and haven&#8217;t changed title.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
