words that work
[Image courtesy of Eric at Flickr Creative Commons]
I was chatting a few weeks back with a friend of a friend who’s relaunching his website.
He’s spending a small fortune on design, but that’s OK, because he’s making a large fortune in a business that’s so niche you’ve probably never heard of it. I certainly hadn’t.
Naturally, I asked what he was doing about the copy.
“Oh we’re writing that in-house,” he said confidently.
With an in-house writer, I wondered? Not a bit of it. He said he was simply getting the ‘people who know the business’ to put something together that would accurately reflect who they were, what they did and what made them different from the competition.
Now at first glance, that might sound like a good idea. After all, the people who know the business are best placed to write about it, aren’t they? It also means they don’t have to explain to an external writer the ins and outs of a pretty complex operation.
And it’s free, coming out of company time that’s already budgeted for through salaries (and in this case, a generous profit-share scheme).
But let’s just play devil’s advocate for a moment here. Why would it not be a good idea to write copy in-house?
Here are six pretty compelling reasons:
The bottom line is this that you’re giving a complex writing task to people who don’t write for a living. And defocusing them from what they should be doing for a living – which in turn damages your business.
Or to turn the problem on its head: would you let a professional writer run your business development? Probably not.
An internal writer may be the answer to your problem, but then again, have you got enough work to keep them busy five days a week, every week of the year? If not, then they’re not paying their way. So that also comes at a cost.
And in the end, did I seize the day and pitch for the work on my friend’s friend’s site?
Not directly, because it might have appeared opportunistic, especially in a social setting. But I did hint at the dots.
Now let’s see if he joins them.