[Image courtesy of Jason Weaver Flickr Creative Commons]
I had a very interesting discussion late last year with a web designer friend of mine. He said I was old-fashioned. I said he was jumping on the latest bandwagon, with little thought for the destination.
But it was all good-natured and in the end we actually both conceded that, as with almost everything, there’s no ‘right’ choice.
We were talking about the trend that’s sweeping web design at the moment for long, scrolling pages with big blocks of text and graphics. Instead of having Home/About/How it works/Find out more/Products & Services/Contact links at the top of of your home page, you have sections on one long page.
Some sites even retain those navigation links, but simply take the reader to the relevant section on the same page.
My friend’s argument was that this makes navigation and reading simpler and more straightforward. You reduce the work that visitors have to do, and with fewer distractions, they can focus on the content.
My reservation was – and still is, to a certain extent – that it can be a little overwhelming, and at times feels like those horrible long-sales-copy pages we know and hate (But that’s not all! You’ll also get a FREE e-book worth $199…).
Now I don’t make New Year’s resolutions, but I did decide earlier this month (though not on the first) to let go of what I think I know, and entertain other viewpoints.
After all, if other people believe things as strongly as they do, and as strongly as I do, they must have some basis for it. At least I’d like to think so.
So maybe my natural aversion to long, scrolling pages is a general prejudice based on a few specific examples. Maybe I need to let go of my long-copy preconceptions and see what the advantages of the new layout are.
And I have to admit it – my friend was pretty convincing. He said:
So there are some really convincing arguments in favour of pared-down, or even one-page, websites. So what about the arguments against?
Well here are some:
So there are some definite downsides too. But whatever design you opt for, the rules of good copy still apply.
You should chunk your copy into meaningful sections, summarise what you’ve said/are going to say, and organise your content logically.
Every section – just like every page in the old paradigm – should serve a purpose or else it shouldn’t be there.
The great thing abut the new layout is that sections are generally shorter than pages would have been, so you’re forced to be concise and waffle-free.
This new design is bigger, bolder and less detailed. Which means copy is more top-level and needs to get to the point faster. It also has to work with, not against, the design.
And it needs to bear in mind that smartphone and tablet readers are a more impatient bunch, used to the economy of words and ruthless focus that apps give them.
So in the spirit of my New Year’s non-resolution, have I come around to my friend’s way of thinking?
Well I still don’t think there’s a right and a wrong in all of this. Complex, multi-page websites will always be around, and larger organisations will probably never move entirely to the long-page layout. It simply may not make sense for the way they operate. And more importantly, it may not make sense to their visitors.
As always, flexibility is the key – in layout as in everything else.
And as my friend reminded me (as if I needed it) the audience always comes first.